“World War Z” director Marc Forster discusses his spin on the zombie genre

by Ben Marques

The director of “Finding Neverland,” “Stranger Than Fiction,” and “Quantum of Solace” is bringing both the living dead and deeper meaning to a theater near you. Brace yourself. “World War Z” follows United Nations worker Gerry Lane (Brad Pitt) who is trying to solve the zombie epidemic plaguing the world.

WSN attended a phone conference with director Marc Forster to discover the innovative way he adapted the source material, “World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War” by Max Brooks, into an epic summer blockbuster. He explained, “[The book] is more of a template as it is not a standard linear narrative… in Max’s book you have short stories told from the past and our film starts in the present.”

Forster took the documentary-like style of the book and shifted it into a more traditional story while retaining the book’s “hyper real” feeling in order to make the characters and the reality of the situation both pressing and present. Now, Lane is the one at the forefront actively searching for answers, rather than just interviewing survivors in the aftermath in the book.

The film’s release was pushed back after the ending was completely rewritten and reshot. Forster’s response to an inquiry into this was simple: “We went to the studio and asked for additional photography to make the film stronger and the studio supported us entirely.” Even with such a large-scale production, Forster was able to retain an admirable level of artistic integrity.

The metaphorical strength of the zombie tale is something that drew Forster to this material, with the ever-present issues of consumerism and overpopulation. Remembering his childhood, Forster recalled, “I was fascinated with biology, with ants, fish and flocks of birds, swarming mentality – the feeling that a [swarm] has a brain of its own.” He was interested in making a fun film that would allow an audience to look deeper if they wish. By providing that second, deeper layer in conjunction with the madness, he said he hoped “everyone will have his or her own interpretation.”

Rather than looking for inspiration in films like “Dawn of the Dead” and “28 Days Later” or television shows like “The Walking Dead,” Forster picked them apart in order to know what to avoid. By acknowledging what was already available to audiences, he was able to bring innovation to his “Z’s.”

“I wanted to create a feeling within the movie that this could happen ‘in reality,’ and thus we worked to make the film as real as possible.”

Though there are massive, sprawling sequences featuring both real actors and CGI zombies, it was important to Forster that everything maintained a degree of plausibility. When the challenges of coordination and technology appeared daunting at times, Forster had to remind himself that he was the one in charge of communicating his vision to his crew and to the rest of world. And thankfully, he said, ” I’ve been lucky enough to say I’ve walked away at the end of the films I made, with the thought of, yes, my vision was there. I think that’s the most important thing.”

Ben Marques is a contributing writer. Email him at film@nyunews.com.

Posted in Film | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Unfinished Song” proves flawed but not without its share of perks

by J.R. Hammerer

song-for-marion03

“Unfinished Song” doesn’t run the risk of triteness. Despite the best intentions, it can’t resist serenading and crooning to it, tempting it and flirting it. The notes of this British musical-dramedy are taken wholesale from other films, and the orchestrations that are Paul Andrew Williams’ direction lack subtlety or surprise. Still, it has talented actors giving honest, unfussy performances, and they are able to find deeper levels beneath the cutesy window dressing. Think of it as a cappella; though every a cappella group has some impressive, expressive voices, they are arranged by the form into a broader, blander sound that’s in love with itself.

The basic story is a good one. Arthur (Terence Stamp) cares for his sickly wife Marion (Vanessa Redgrave) alone in their small town–when he’s not grudgingly hauling her off to practices of a choir for senior citizens. Arthur, being a grumpy, no-nonsense Scrooge, frowns upon the more upbeat tone set by the group’s young conductor (Gemma Arterton). But when her group enters a chorus competition and starts to compete for a taste of the spotlight, Arthur reluctantly warms to his wife’s new passion–and gradually starts joining in himself.

“Unfinished Song” is at its most interesting when it focuses on its two elder characters and the therapeutic value that they find in music. The scenes between Arthur and Marion as Marion slowly succumbs to cancer have the most potential for cheap tear jerking, but they show keen observation and a genuine thoughtfulness. It’s no “Amour,” but it’s here that the characters and their emotions feel most palpable. This is undoubtedly because the two actors never condescend to either the material or the audience. Stamp, his stately boom of a voice weathered by age, conveys Arthur’s rigidity with his typically commanding presence, and wisely keeps his development from getting too gooey. Redgrave’s Marion faces death with dignity and the stage with grace, and her chemistry with Stamp is natural and warm. Their singing voices, though rough, unsteady warbles, can take Cyndi Lauper and Billy Joel and turn them into the purest form of music–the kind that can say what can’t be spoken.

But the rest of the choir–and the movie–is too eager to inspire; it confuses greeting card sentiment with profundity. The performances, as the senior citizens learn Motorhead and Salt-N-Pepa, have a whimsy whose self-satisfaction grates badly. It’s not the conductor’s fault–the adorable, underutilized Arterton gives her underwritten character a spark of serious melancholy to go with the spunk. But everything about her choir is so gosh darn eager-to-please, so predictable in its joy-making, that it dilutes the emotional impact. The elderly couple’s two solos are meant to be big, moving moments, but the attempt to affect us is so blatantly obvious that it’s almost disrespectful. We can feel the real things coming through Redgrave and Stamp, there’s no need to underline it further.

Some are fine with this kind of underlining, and “Unfinished Song” is a good movie regardless of the bubblegum pop presentation. Sugar can grow rancid, and when it does it’s a line in the sand. But even a cappella has its moments.

J.R. Hammerer is a staff writer. Email him at film@nyunews.com.

Posted in Film | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

True Blood, Season 6, Episode 1: “Who Are You, Really?”

Via IGN

In its sixth season premiere, everyone in “True Blood” is hungry, and surprisingly, they’re not hungry for blood.

One of this season’s themes is a thirst for power, and it goes to show us that this time, our favorite characters will not only be fighting each other but themselves as well.

The season premiere, aptly titled “Who Are You, Really?,” picks up at the end of Season 5, with Bill being reborn as Billith (Lillith is inside Bill’s body, that is) to the horror of Sookie and Eric, who promptly run away from him.  Thankfully, Eric and Sookie conveniently pick up the “ragtag band of fuckups” that include Pam, Tara, Jason, and Nora and quickly leave the Authority compound, but not before seeing Billith in all his/her/its glory, walking through fire and flying up into the air.

But let’s not forget about Sam and Luna who broke into the Authority to find Emma and bring her back.  Unfortunately, Luna’s shift took the best of her and she dies.  Sam promised Luna to take care of Emma and the new pair runs off into the darkness to find shelter.

On the long car ride back to Bon Temps, the gang of misfits endures more unwelcome news, more arguing, and more tears.  Nora thinks Bill has been reborn in Lilith’s image, but Eric counters with the fact that we still don’t actually know what he is.  Who is Bill, really?

The car’s radio begins to air a message from the governor of Louisiana, and we are introduced to Truman Burrell, who is asserting a statewide curfew for vampires after sundown and the shutting down of all vampire-run businesses in Louisiana.  Our human vs. vamps theme this season is definitely not off to a positive, or maybe I should say A-positive, start for the vamps.

Maybe answering the episode’s title’s question is impossible — we later learn even Bill doesn’t know what he is.  When Jessica and Sookie arrive at Bill’s house from his summoning of Jessica, Eric and Nora attack Bill, but Bill throws Nora aside and begins to strangle Eric.  To everyone’s surprise, Sookie runs up behind Bill and stakes him through the heart.  But then he doesn’t get all gooey and gross, and no one even remotely knows what kind of problem their up against. All Bill knows is that he is “clearly something more” than the Bill Compton we used to know and possibly love, if you’re into his character.

Meanwhile, in the more normal — at least by “True Blood’s” standards — parts of Bon Temps, Andy and Arlene have a real sweet heart to heart about raising babies.  Andy is scared that he can’t father his fae children, but Arlene consoles him with a pep talk that could make even the coldest person feel warm and fuzzy.  We leave that storyline with a shocking discovery — Andy’s baby girls have suddenly grown up three years overnight, which is possibly the worst/best news anyone could ever have.

Alcide is the new pack master now, which seems to already have gone to his head.  Pack member Martha insightfully stated to Rikki, Alcide’s on-and-off girlfriend, that the V Alcide took to win packmaster would wear off, but that his newfound power is the more dangerous addiction.  Power is the key to many of the character’s storylines and it will be interesting to see how all of those play out together.

In possibly the sweetest moment of the episode, Sookie and Eric reconnect after Eric realizes Sookie staked Bill to save Eric’s life, thinking she never would have done that.  Sookie reflects on how much she’s changed and Eric gives Sookie back her house to protect her from any vampires trying to hurt her.  And in an effort to reclaim her old life, Sookie rescinded Eric’s invitation to her house.  After all they’ve been though, there is a new mutual understanding between the two that shares friendship and respect.

This season of “True Blood” is sure to make some Truebies angry and heartbroken, as the tagline promises, “No one lives forever.” But the show is sure to keep viewers hooked.  “Who Are You, Really?” successfully sets up several story arcs that will keep building until the end, where we can only hope our favorite characters will survive.

Laura Wolford is a staff writer.  Email her at entertainment@nyunews.com.

Posted in Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Tiger Eyes” star Amy Jo Johnson talks Judy Blume, New Mexico and music

by Jake Folsom

In the new film adaptation of Judy Blume’s novel “Tiger Eyes,” Amy Jo Johnson plays the protagonist’s mother Gwen, who struggles with the sudden loss of her husband. WSN spoke with Johnson about topics such as the importance of portraying grief in movies, the differences between film and TV acting, and picturesque New Mexico.

WSN: Did you have much experience with Blume’s work before this movie? Did you read her books growing up?

AJJ
: Actually, I first really got into her in my twenties. Me and my sister were obsessed with her books. My favorite was “Summer Sisters.” I think that could make a really great movie.

WSN: It’s funny that more of Judy Blume’s books haven’t been made into movies.

AJJ: It really is, there is so much potential!

WSN: I remember that during the Q&A last Friday, it was brought up that one of the first scenes you filmed on set was actually your last scene in the movie.

AJJ: That was actually the very first scene we filmed! We did it in 15 minutes right after arriving to the set.

WSN: It’s so impressive that you were able to convincingly inhabit your character without much time on set. As an actor, how are you able to find that emotion?

AJJ: What really helped me was personal experience. My mom died ten years ago, and that scene was just written so well. I identified with the feeling that Gwen [Johnson’s character] “hadn’t been ready to talk” about death in the family—sometimes it is just too hard. I also really identified with her being a mom. Lawrence [Blume, “Tiger Eyes”’ director] says that actors often do their best work when they’re tired. I think this is so true; it’s important not to over-think things, and being tired helps with that.

WSN: The film draws a lot of its great visuals from its New Mexico setting, and you mentioned during the Q&A that you loved being there. Why is that?

AJJ: I had actually shot in New Mexico before for “Wildfire.” There is just something in the air in New Mexico. Albuquerque and Santa Fe. I would almost say it’s spiritual. There is so much fantastic stuff there—beautiful rainbows and sunsets, even a hot air balloon festival I’ve gone to with my husband. It’s such a magical place.

WSN: Your character spends a lot of time in “Tiger Eyes” paralyzed by grief. Watching the film, did you ever feel frustrated with your character for not helping her kids out more?

AJJ: I rarely watch anything I’m in, so watching the film, I mainly felt really nervous! But I was relieved because the film turned really well. I understand how she might seem frustrating to some people, but I was really glad to see a movie—especially one for younger people—that shows grief in a realistic way. That’s a topic that often gets skipped over, and when people experience grief for the first time, it can be surprising to them to find out what that emotion is really like.

WSN: Lawrence Blume talked about how “Tiger Eyes” doesn’t have some of the clichés found in so many recent Hollywood teen movies—as he put it, “there are no vampires.” Do you share his frustration with these kinds of movies?

AJJ: To be honest, I rarely watch anything like that. I feel very disconnected, because I spend so much time with my daughter, and her favorite show is “My Little Pony!”

WSN: A lot of our readers know you from shows like “Felicity. How do working on big network TV shows compare with a small independent film?

AJJ: I actually find them really similar. TV moves very fast—an episode is filmed in seven days, so it’s a scramble to get everything finished. Films are a little different because TV shows are ongoing over longer periods, but a movie shoot like this moves at about the same pace. I have only worked on one bigger budget movie, but if I had to do that all the time I think it could get really boring! I mean, I’m sure it would be awesome in some ways, but I would have so much spare time and get bored out of my mind. I would have to bring my guitar, or something.

WSN: Is guitar still a big passion of yours? You always played it on “Felicity!”

AJJ: Yes! I actually have a new album coming out this summer. [curious parties can go to amyjojohnson.com for more information]

WSN: Thanks so much for talking. It’s been a pleasure!

AJJ: Bye!

Jake Folsom is a staff writer. Email him at film@nyunews.com.

Posted in Film | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

“Call Me Kuchu” delves into LGBT activism in Uganda

by J.R. Hammerer

As much as America’s treatment of gay and transgender people has progressed over the past decade, the LGBT community still struggles for the freedom to live as themselves. Rarely has that been more vivid than in Uganda, where a bill to make homosexuality a capital crime has been proposed and debated since 2008, and where to be gay is to run the risk of shame and violence. “Call Me Kuchu” centers on the offense–the Ugandan activists who fight the feverish, naked homophobia of their nation, whipped up by yellow journalism and American evangelists. Its awareness of the high cost of freedom, what it needs and what it takes, gives it an urgency rare in political docs.

The center of “Call Me Kuchu” is David Kato, the first openly gay man in Uganda and the leader of a collective trying to stem the tide of prejudice. A lively, witty presence, he is a warm, humble man welcoming toward one and all. His openness towards his peers and matter-of-fact frankness towards his identity is a rare, inspiring act of defiance against his nation’s witch hunt against “kuchus” like him. But he goes further, proving himself a charismatic leader and a shrewd organizer as he works to liberate his friends from the fear shrouding every day.

When a Ugandan tabloid begins publicly outing kuchus, using entrapment and invasion of privacy to catch them in the act, Kato and his compatriots decide to take the newspaper to court. The victory would be a small one at best, and the chances are slim in such a hostile nation. But after you’ve heard the paper’s managing editor calmly stating that calling for gays to hang is not incitement to violence, and after you’ve seen the shunning and heard about the beatings and corrective rapes, you understand how real–and how dangerous–the stakes are. Wisely, the facts and faces speak for themselves throughout “Call Me Kuchu.” In the face of such extreme emotion, the filmmakers know that underlining anything will only dilute the reality.

Kato was launched into international news during the filming of the documentary, when he was brutally murdered after winning his trial. While the filmmakers foreshadow the cruel twist of fate, they refuse to sound the drum of martyrdom–the focus is kept on Kato’s impact instead of heavy-handed moralizing. The flock of anti-gay protesters refusing to let his friends and family grieve in peace is hard to watch, as is the spite visible in his enemies after the tragedy. But in Uganda and around the world, others are passing on his passion, and others are continuing the fight. “Call Me Kuchu” ends abruptly, and with some uncertainty about the ultimate fate of the kuchus, but that’s because it isn’t over. The struggle is still building, still gathering strength.

J.R. Hammerer is a staff writer. Email him at film@nyunews.com.

Posted in Film | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Arrested Development, Season 4, Episode 1: “Flight of the Phoenix”

By Isabel Jones

Via the AV Club

“Arrested Development” has returned at last, though maybe not in its finest form.

Seven years later, “Development” struggles engross its audience in the “story of a family whose future was abruptly cancelled.” The main cast members have, in fact, all returned (the season even features a cameo by Anyong), but their appearances are largely separate. Each of the 15 episodes is dedicated to a different character, creating a disjointed collection of experiences that are slowly pieced together with the start of every episode. The fourth season’s first episode, “Flight of the Phoenix” carries the burden of an audience’s dashed expectations.

Naturally, Michael Bluth is the first to be featured. No longer living in the model home, Michael resorts to moving into his son’s dorm room at UC Irvine, causing their relationship to become strained. After long awaiting a reference, George Michael finally approaches the dreaded cultural context of his first name, asserting that he might want to change it. Michael replies, “It was your mother’s idea to call you George Michael. And I think it was just so we didn’t confuse you with your uncle George or your grandfather George. I got it, let’s call you Boy George.” Based on that exchange alone, the fourth season earns my stamp of approval.

The cameos are entertaining, most notably in the flashback sequences featuring a young George Sr. and Lucille, fittingly played by Seth Rogen and Kristin Wiig. But it’s not just the new guests that work well — the returning ones are great, too. Returning guest star Liza Minnelli (Lucille “Two” Austero) makes her mark on the episode as well, dizzily stumbling her way toward the position of main Bluth Company shareholder. Buster, in his few moments of screen time, debuts a bejeweled new hook. One episode down and this season is already suffering from a lack of Buster Bluth.

George Michael and Maeby collude to oust an overly sensitive Michael from the dorm. The father-dorm-room storyline, while entertaining, is a bit far fetched, even for “Development.” Fourth season Michael is portrayed to be a truly weak character, obnoxiously intruding upon his son’s life. He has not been the most courteous guest, alienating George Michael’s actual, college-aged roommate (P-Hound), as well as his privacy. This behavior is inconsistent with the Michael of seasons past, being “Development’s” straight man,—or straight-er man. The sense of entitlement he feels seems akin to, dare I say, Lucille Bluth.

The long awaited televised return of the Bluth clan leaves a bit to be desired. Still fantastically odd and clever after all these years, the format of the episode is confusing and the absence of many of the major players is disappointing. But with anticipation so high, and a marketing campaign so successful, it would be difficult for expectations to be met completely with a single episode. However, some things never change. Lucille Austero is still falling over, Gob still periodically roofies himself and others, and George Sr. is still unknowingly racist.

Isabel Jones is staff writer.  Email her entertainment@nyunews.com.

Posted in Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Judy and Lawrence Blume talk realistic teen movies with “Tiger Eyes”

by Jake Folsom

“Tiger Eyes,” frank and unadorned, tells the story of a girl from Atlantic City (Davey Wexler, played in the film by Willa Holland) coping with her father’s sudden, brutal murder. Davey’s mother is devastated, and takes Davey and her kid brother to live with her sister in Albuquerque. Here Davey must grapple with much more than her father’s death. Her aunt and uncle are overbearing and cruel, her friend is an alcoholic and her mother is numbing herself with behavior meds. If all this sounds familiar, it may be because you read the source material for “Tiger Eyes” — Judy Blume’s novel of the same name.

Negative critiques of “Tiger Eyes” have been that the film is too angsty and formulaic. But don’t these complaints apply to most teen “coming of age” movies? Not to say “Tiger Eyes” isn’t sometimes guilty of such tropes, but what are teenagers if not angsty? And considering teen moves of recent years, “Tiger Eyes” seems a cut above.

The film subverts the clichés of blockbuster Hollywood. In a post movie Q&A, Judy Blume made it clear that this was no accident—the production team didn’t peruse a big studio because they wanted more creative control. Davey’s boyfriend in the film is a Native American boy named Martin who Davey calls Wolf. With thoughts of big studio Hollywood, comparisons to “Twilight” films were stirred, but unlike that franchise, “Tiger Eyes” doesn’t give Wolf a crew-cut and 8-pack abs.  Blume’s son and “Tiger Eyes” director Lawrence Blume said, “[“Tiger Eyes”] doesn’t have vampires, it doesn’t have dystopia, it doesn’t have anything supernatural. Studios wouldn’t want it because they wouldn’t know how to sell it.”

It is this realism that makes Judy Blume’s work essential for young people. “Twilight,” like “Tiger Eyes,” is melodramatic, but “Twilight” does not stay grounded in the real lives of its audience. “Tiger Eyes” shows us dramatic problems but rarely unrealistic ones. Adults are wrapped up in gossipy social circles. There is a straight-A student with a drinking problem. A kid brother isn’t able to show grief for his father’s death.

The film does sand down some of the grit found in Blume’s novel. Davey’s dad owns a quaint looking “sandwich shop” in the film rather than a 7-Eleven in the book, and this makes a little less sense when he is robbed at gunpoint and subsequently shot. Further, Wolf is in Albuquerque for a loving goodbye when Davey finds out she is moving back to Atlantic City. In the book Wolf has left town, and Davey has been sending him letters.

“Tiger Eyes” goes where so few other “teen movies” tread—reality. Teenagers today are inundated with media fantasy, and Blume’s particular brand of realism seems comforting. During the Q&A, an audience member thanked the Blumes for their realistic portrayal of “sudden death in the family.” Critics may decry the angst of “Tiger Eyes,” but audience members may find it resonant with their realities.

Jake Folsom is a staff writer. Email him at film@nyunews.com.

Posted in Film | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment